California’s Assembly Bill 5: Disruption of Gig Economy?

COW image
Elliot Dinkin of Cowden

Elliot Dinkin of Cowden Associates underscores the implications of Assembly Bill 5–and how it could disrupt the gig economy.

California’s new Assembly Bill 5, signed into law on September 18, 2019, leads to questions of the stability of the gig economy in that state. If individuals must reclassify to employees from independent contractors, there is a real threat to the viability of the business model, according to Cowden Associates CEO Elliot Dinkin.

PHILADELPHIA – October 21, 2019 — Following months of negotiations, lawmakers in California have passed legislation that would require companies to evaluate whether certain current independent contractors should be actually treated as employees thereby availing them to the same rights and benefits for similarly situated individuals. Although the primary targets of the legislation are independent contractors of Uber and Lyft, the new law, known as Assembly Bill 5, extends to other independent contractors, and is seen as problematic by many and could trigger changes and instability well beyond California.

“If these individuals end up being treated as some form of employees, then certain business models may no longer be sustainable,” said Elliot Dinkin, a nationally known expert in actuarial, compensation, and employee benefits issues. “The primary reason: cost relating to a variety of areas, such as payroll taxes, workers’ compensation, health and welfare, and retirement benefits.”

Other states have also began the process of introducing similar legislation as they follow California’s lead and enact similar measures. California has long been the starting place for policies adopted across the United States.

If enacted nationally, Assembly Bill 5 could affect 15.5 million U.S. workers who have alternative arrangements for their primary employment—independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers and workers provided by contract firms — according to a report released in 2018 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics [1].

That number could grow exponentially over the next decade. An NPR/Marist poll conducted in January 2018 found that one in five jobs in America is held by a worker under contract and that, “within a decade, contractors and freelancers could make up half of the American workforce.” The same poll determined that 51 percent of contract workers don’t receive benefits from their jobs, which is one of the factors Assembly bill 5 is intended to remedy [2].

It’s not only employers that could be negatively impacted by the bill. Some Uber and Lyft drivers have spoken against Assembly 5, arguing that they enjoy the flexibility of knowing that they alone determine when they will and will not work, a convenience that will likely disappear if the bill is, implemented as currently written.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has indicated he is open to negotiating with large companies like Uber and Lyft before the law goes into effect on January 1. Uber had suggested establishing a minimum wage for its drivers of $21 an hour as an alternative to the bill’s more radical changes, or challenging the law via 2020 ballot initiative. Uber claims that the law does not apply to its drivers and has made clear its intention to defend the position in court [3].

Some labor experts predict a 30 percent increase in company cost if the bill is implemented in its current form, which could further sink Uber’s struggling bottom line; the company reported a $5.2 billion loss in the second

PRWeb ebooks – Another online visibility tool from PRWeb

quarter [4].

Whatever the percentage, the change will force companies that use freelancers and independent contractors to redesign their business model to address higher expenditures.

“Uber and Lyft will have to decide what to do with the cost increases,” said Dinkin. “If they want to preserve their profit position, then the additional costs, which can be viewed in a similar fashion to a tariff, will be assumed by the consumer. Hence the concern about ending the business model.”

“Certain people are very attracted to this type of work and flexibility and will most likely drop out as they may not like fixed schedules or other rules and requirements,” Dinkin continued. “It has seemingly been a very popular job, based solely on the numbers of drivers.”

About Cowden Associates:

Cowden Associates, Inc., headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA, was created in 2001 by the merger of Halliwell and

Associates and MMC&P Spectrum Benefits, which was founded by Jere Cowden in 1986. Currently led by President & CEO Elliot Dinkin, Cowden Associates specializes in helping corporate clients find the best solutions, both for the enterprise and for its employees, with regard to compensation, healthcare benefits, retirement and pension issues, and Taft-Hartley fund consulting. Winning Workplaces and The Wall Street Journal have recognized Cowden Associates as a “Top Small Workplace,” a lifetime designation awarded to executives for their ability to build and lead savvy organizations. For more information, visit www.cowdenassociates.com

  1. United States Department of labor Bureau of Labor Statistics June 7, 2018
  2. Freelanced: The Rise of the Contract Workforce” NPR, January 22, 2018
  3. “California Passes landmark gig economy rights bill,” BBC News, September 11, 2019
  4. “Uber posts record loss of $5.2 billion in the wake of going public,” The Washington Post, August 8, 2019

Advice Disclaimer. This information is not intended to be a substitute for professional public relations or legal advice. Do not disregard professional legal advice or delay seeking professional PR or legal advice because of something you have read here. Contact an attorney to obtain advice on any particular legal issue or problem. Use of this Web site or any of its e-mail links do not create an agency-client relationship between JoTo PR and the user.